Greenlandic Females Secure Judicial Victory in Struggle against Denmark over Coerced IUD Affair.

Victims of a past campaign where numerous comprising Greenlandic females, some minors reportedly were covertly implanted using intrauterine devices (IUDs) without their knowledge or consent have claimed a win in their court battle against the Danish government.

It has been announced the women are now eligible for financial redress from a settlement package.

Parliamentary Agreement Finalized

Folketinget, along with state authorities, finalized a deal that entitles approximately 4,500 affected individuals to claim kr. 300,000 (£35,000) each.

The announcement follows a lengthy battle led by 143 women that filed a lawsuit demanding damages for the trauma and distress they had endured, arguing it constituted a violation of fundamental personal rights.

Colonial Context

The Danish state administered Greenland as a colony for decades maintaining authority over its healthcare system into the late 20th century.

In September, following a long period where it did not address the violations, the government made an expression of regret. The country's leader expressed sorrow for the “systemic discrimination” against women and girls within the state medical apparatus.

“It has had major consequences on the affected women who suffered not only physical and mental trauma,” said a senior official.

Compensation Procedure Outlined

The health ministry stated those subjected to contraception covertly during a thirty-one year period can seek compensation starting next year. Relevant legislation will come into force by mid-year.

Based on the findings from a impartial inquiry of contraceptive practices during that time, an estimated four and a half thousand women are potentially eligible for compensation.

For eligibility, applicants must:

  • Provide a “credible report” of the incident.
  • Demonstrate they resided on the island throughout the specified timeframe.
  • State on oath that they possessed no knowledge nor gave permission for the procedure.

Perspectives of Victims

A plaintiffs, who was fourteen at the time she was told to report for medical attention without explanation, described the experience as feeling a violation.

“Our activism as speakers and interviewees proved successful,” she said. “We started two years ago resulting in a relatively short time we have secured an apology and compensation.”

A different perspective shared satisfaction, saying, “We are happy. Like my mother said: we won.” Although there is a view the amount could have been higher, they expressed contentment regarding the acknowledgment of what happened.

Ministerial Responses

A Greenlandic minister described the settlement being “well past due”. She emphasized, “This isn't primarily financial. It is about formal acknowledgment of the injury and its very severe implications.”

The relevant health minister acknowledged these events represent a “troubling period within the joint past”, adding while redress “cannot remove the suffering for survivors” but it “serves to recognize and express regret over what they endured.”

Vicki Ayala
Vicki Ayala

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in helping startups and enterprises optimize their online presence for growth.