🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense debate over their future often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who interact with them daily.

After the federal government prevented the export of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are remarkably smart animals – something Kristy Burgess learned directly.

She spent three years as a beluga trainer, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each altered the way I perceive bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her time at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which activists say indicates the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The park did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not respond to a questionnaire, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and around the clock attention than any person in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the demise of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park believed details of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports calls for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official denied a proposal to transfer the whales to China.

“To approve the request would have meant a ongoing life in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a wider lack of awareness of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations.

A proposed sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The future facility, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the possibility of a refuge reflects a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a workable plan in the coming months.

An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the health of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|